
As an Amazon Associate and affiliate partner, Menrva Books earns from qualifying purchases. Learn more
Most People Agree That Animals Count Morally, But How Exactly Should We Take Animals Into Account? A Prominent Stance In Contemporary Ethical Discussions Is That Animals Have The Same Moral Status That People Do, And So In Moral Deliberation The Similar Interests Of Animals And People Should Be Given The Very Same Consideration. In How To Count Animals, More Or Less, Shelly Kagan Sets Out And Defends A Hierarchical Approach In Which People Count More Than Animals Do And Some Animals Count More Than Others. For The Most Part, Moral Theories Have Not Been Developed In Such A Way As To Take Account Of Differences In Status. By Arguing For A Hierarchical Account Of Morality - And Exploring What Status Sensitive Principles Might Look Like - Kagan Reveals Just How Much Work Needs To Be Done To Arrive At An Adequate View Of Our Duties Toward Animals, And Of Morality More Generally.
How should moral status be distributed between humans and animals, and is a hierarchical framework more accurate than egalitarianism? Shelly Kagan, a professor of philosophy at Yale University, utilizes analytical moral philosophy to challenge the prevailing view that all sentient beings deserve equal moral consideration. He argues that a hierarchical model, which distinguishes between the moral weight of different species and individuals, provides a more nuanced and practical approach to ethical decision-making.
What You Will Find
Scope Limits
Experts in moral philosophy recognize this work as a rigorous contribution to the ongoing debate regarding animal ethics. Readers frequently note the academic density of the prose, which requires a strong background in philosophical argumentation to fully appreciate.
Page Count:
296
Publication Date:
2019-01-01
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
ISBN-10:
0192565176
ISBN-13:
9780192565174
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!