This work investigates the core question of whether normative moral and political views can be scientifically explained despite their lack of objective justification. Russell Hardin, a scholar of political theory, utilizes Hume's writings to argue that moral and political systems are rooted in psychological mechanisms rather than absolute truths. By situating Hume within the early social science tradition, Hardin posits that Hume's theories on sympathy and convention serve as the foundation for modern utilitarian thought.

Scholars frequently note the analytical rigor Hardin applies to Hume's strategic reasoning. Experts highlight this text as a significant contribution to understanding the intersection of historical philosophy and contemporary social science methodology.